PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALV vs. BPOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALV vs. BPOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Popular, Inc. (BPOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALV achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than BPOP's 20.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ALV has underperformed BPOP with an annualized return of 6.43%, while BPOP has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.


ALV

1D
-0.96%
1M
14.60%
YTD
11.57%
6M
10.56%
1Y
30.86%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
6.43%

BPOP

1D
-1.97%
1M
0.56%
YTD
20.25%
6M
28.50%
1Y
43.91%
3Y*
36.77%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
20.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALV vs. BPOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
11.57%30.24%-12.72%47.99%-23.47%14.50%9.99%24.32%-21.57%14.81%
BPOP
Popular, Inc.
20.25%36.01%17.86%28.33%-16.78%49.06%-0.00%27.21%35.80%-16.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ALV and BPOP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 1997

0.36

The correlation between ALV and BPOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALV:

$9.79B

BPOP:

$9.61B

EPS

ALV:

$9.32

BPOP:

$13.50

PE Ratio

ALV:

14.00

BPOP:

10.97

PEG Ratio

ALV:

0.74

BPOP:

1.21

PS Ratio

ALV:

0.90

BPOP:

2.24

PB Ratio

ALV:

3.72

BPOP:

1.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALV:

$10.99B

BPOP:

$4.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALV:

$2.12B

BPOP:

$3.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALV:

$1.38B

BPOP:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALV vs. BPOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALV
ALV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ALV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ALV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BPOP
BPOP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BPOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BPOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPOP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALV vs. BPOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Popular, Inc. (BPOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALVBPOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.00

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

7.88

-3.94

ALV vs. BPOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BPOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALV and BPOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALVBPOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.81

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.53

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.61

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.13

+0.11

Drawdowns

ALV vs. BPOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALV drawdown since its inception was -79.72%, smaller than the maximum BPOP drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALV and BPOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALVBPOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.72%

-95.72%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.96%

-14.68%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.27%

-22.63%

-16.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-46.27%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

-59.03%

-4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-18.29%

+17.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-48.87%

+27.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

5.59%

+2.26%

Volatility

ALV vs. BPOP - Volatility Comparison

Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Popular, Inc. (BPOP) at 5.68%. This indicates that ALV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALVBPOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.25%

5.68%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.57%

17.83%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.68%

24.41%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.99%

30.22%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.89%

33.54%

+0.35%

Dividends

ALV vs. BPOP - Dividend Comparison

ALV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than BPOP's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
2.65%2.63%2.92%2.41%3.37%1.82%0.67%2.94%3.02%1.87%2.03%1.78%
BPOP
Popular, Inc.
2.03%2.33%2.72%2.77%3.32%2.13%2.84%2.04%2.12%2.82%1.37%1.06%

Financials

ALV vs. BPOP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoliv, Inc. and Popular, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.75B
1.11B
(ALV) Total Revenue
(BPOP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALV vs. BPOP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoliv, Inc. and Popular, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
75.1%
Portfolio components
ALV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 526.00M and revenue of 2.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

BPOP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Popular, Inc. reported a gross profit of 835.81M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.1%.

ALV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.00M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

BPOP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Popular, Inc. reported an operating income of 292.61M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

ALV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 142.00M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

BPOP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Popular, Inc. reported a net income of 245.67M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 22.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALV and BPOP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALV has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to BPOP (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALV dropped -79.72% vs BPOP's -95.72%.

BPOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALV and BPOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer