PortfoliosLab logo
ALV vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALV and MCK is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ALV vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALV:

-0.50

MCK:

1.05

Sortino Ratio

ALV:

-0.60

MCK:

1.55

Omega Ratio

ALV:

0.93

MCK:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

ALV:

-0.46

MCK:

1.32

Martin Ratio

ALV:

-0.78

MCK:

3.25

Ulcer Index

ALV:

23.22%

MCK:

9.73%

Daily Std Dev

ALV:

33.02%

MCK:

27.68%

Max Drawdown

ALV:

-79.72%

MCK:

-82.83%

Current Drawdown

ALV:

-18.10%

MCK:

-0.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALV:

$8.09B

MCK:

$89.11B

EPS

ALV:

$8.67

MCK:

$25.73

PE Ratio

ALV:

12.07

MCK:

27.71

PEG Ratio

ALV:

0.85

MCK:

1.13

PS Ratio

ALV:

0.78

MCK:

0.25

PB Ratio

ALV:

3.44

MCK:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALV:

$10.35B

MCK:

$359.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALV:

$1.96B

MCK:

$13.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALV:

$1.43B

MCK:

$5.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALV achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's 26.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ALV has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 3.87%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


ALV

YTD

11.19%

1M

11.05%

6M

5.95%

1Y

-16.55%

3Y*

11.76%

5Y*

12.77%

10Y*

3.87%

MCK

YTD

26.39%

1M

0.94%

6M

14.74%

1Y

28.86%

3Y*

30.47%

5Y*

36.17%

10Y*

12.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Autoliv, Inc.

McKesson Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALV vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALV is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALV is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALV is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALV is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALV is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALV is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCK is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCK is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCK is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCK is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCK is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCK is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALV vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ALV Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALV and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ALV vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

ALV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than MCK's 0.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
2.70%2.92%2.41%3.37%1.82%1.35%2.94%3.02%1.87%2.03%1.78%2.00%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.38%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%

Drawdowns

ALV vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALV drawdown since its inception was -79.72%, roughly equal to the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALV and MCK.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ALV vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) is 6.23%, while McKesson Corporation (MCK) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that ALV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ALV vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoliv, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20212022202320242025
2.58B
90.82B
(ALV) Total Revenue
(MCK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALV vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoliv, Inc. and McKesson Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
18.5%
4.0%
(ALV) Gross Margin
(MCK) Gross Margin
ALV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 478.00M and revenue of 2.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

MCK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.64B and revenue of 90.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.0%.

ALV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 254.00M and revenue of 2.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

MCK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

ALV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 167.00M and revenue of 2.58B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

MCK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.26B and revenue of 90.82B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.