ALV vs. LEA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Lear Corporation (LEA).

Performance

ALV vs. LEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Lear Corporation (LEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALV vs. LEA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALV Autoliv, Inc.	-10.72%	30.24%	-12.72%	47.99%	-23.47%	14.50%	9.99%	24.32%	-21.57%	14.81%
LEA Lear Corporation	6.32%	24.86%	-31.17%	16.40%	-30.70%	16.20%	16.90%	14.38%	-29.29%	35.23%

Fundamentals

EPS ALV : $9.77 LEA : $8.18
PE Ratio ALV : 10.77 LEA : 14.80
PEG Ratio ALV : 0.23 LEA : 1.22
PS Ratio ALV : 0.76 LEA : 0.28
Total Revenue (TTM) ALV : $10.61B LEA : $23.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALV : $2.05B LEA : $1.29B
EBITDA (TTM) ALV : $1.45B LEA : $1.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALV achieves a -10.72% return, which is significantly lower than LEA's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ALV has outperformed LEA with an annualized return of 4.84%, while LEA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.25% annualized return.

ALV

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -10.58%
• YTD: -10.72%
• 6M: -13.52%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 4.84%

LEA

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: -7.17%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 6M: 21.99%
• 1Y: 41.33%
• 3Y*: -2.03%
• 5Y*: -5.46%
• 10Y*: 3.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALV vs. LEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALV

ALV Risk / Return Rank: 65
ALV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ALV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ALV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ALV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ALV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

LEA

LEA Risk / Return Rank: 77
LEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
LEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
LEA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
LEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LEA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALV vs. LEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Lear Corporation (LEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALV	LEA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.17	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.84	-0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.23	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	2.20	-1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.08	5.49	-2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALV vs. LEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALV Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the LEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALV and LEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALV	LEA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.17	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	-0.16	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.09	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.34	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between ALV and LEA is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ALV vs. LEA - Dividend Comparison

ALV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than LEA's 2.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALV Autoliv, Inc.	3.13%	2.63%	2.92%	2.41%	3.37%	1.82%	0.67%	2.94%	3.02%	1.87%	2.03%	1.78%
LEA Lear Corporation	2.54%	2.69%	3.25%	2.18%	2.48%	0.97%	0.64%	2.19%	2.28%	1.13%	0.91%	0.81%

Drawdowns

ALV vs. LEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALV drawdown since its inception was -79.72%, which is greater than LEA's maximum drawdown of -64.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALV and LEA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALV	LEA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.72%	-64.51%	-15.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.96%	-18.98%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.27%	-59.63%	+20.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.09%	-64.51%	+1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.22%	-33.04%	+14.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-19.75%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.92%	7.60%	-0.68%

Volatility

ALV vs. LEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) is 8.93%, while Lear Corporation (LEA) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that ALV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALV	LEA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	9.55%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.37%	22.50%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.97%	35.36%	-7.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.89%	33.92%	-2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.74%	35.23%	-1.49%

Financials

ALV vs. LEA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autoliv, Inc. and Lear Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ALV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.00M and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.3%.

LEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 267.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

LEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 5.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ALV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 175.00M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

LEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 82.70M and revenue of 5.99B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.