ALV vs. LEA
ALV (Autoliv, Inc.) and LEA (Lear Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, ALV returned 7.80%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for LEA. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
ALV vs. LEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALV achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than LEA's 15.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ALV has outperformed LEA with an annualized return of 7.80%, while LEA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.77% annualized return.
ALV
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.81%
LEA
- 1D
- -10.72%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- YTD
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- 44.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.42M | $95.48M | $90.87M | |
| $107.51M | $84.47M | $90.13M |
ALV vs. LEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALV Autoliv, Inc. | 5.36% | 30.24% | -12.72% | 47.99% | -23.47% | 14.50% | 9.99% | 24.32% | -21.57% | 14.81% |
LEA Lear Corporation | 15.32% | 24.86% | -31.17% | 16.40% | -30.70% | 16.20% | 16.90% | 14.38% | -29.29% | 35.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALV and LEA is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ALV and LEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ALV:
$9.02B
LEA:
$6.54B
ALV:
$8.53
LEA:
$10.65
ALV:
14.45
LEA:
12.27
ALV:
0.77
LEA:
1.00
ALV:
0.84
LEA:
0.29
ALV:
3.67
LEA:
0.75
ALV:
$11.08B
LEA:
$23.70B
ALV:
$2.13B
LEA:
$789.80M
ALV:
$1.31B
LEA:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALV vs. LEA — Risk / Return Rank
ALV
LEA
ALV vs. LEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) and Lear Corporation (LEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALV | LEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.23 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 5.54 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALV vs. LEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALV drawdown since its inception was -79.72%, which is greater than LEA's maximum drawdown of -64.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALV and LEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALV | LEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.72% | -64.51% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -18.98% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.27% | -49.42% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -57.83% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -64.51% | +1.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -27.38% | +20.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -19.85% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 7.64% | +0.86% |
Volatility
ALV vs. LEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) is 9.16%, while Lear Corporation (LEA) has a volatility of 13.77%. This indicates that ALV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALV | LEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | 13.77% | -4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.96% | 27.11% | -4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 33.24% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.14% | 34.34% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.76% | 35.39% | -1.63% |
Dividends
ALV vs. LEA - Dividend Comparison
ALV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than LEA's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALV Autoliv, Inc. | 2.81% | 2.63% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 3.37% | 1.82% | 0.67% | 2.94% | 3.02% | 1.87% | 2.03% | 1.78% |
LEA Lear Corporation | 2.36% | 2.69% | 3.25% | 2.18% | 2.48% | 0.97% | 0.64% | 2.19% | 2.28% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 0.81% |
Financials
ALV vs. LEA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autoliv, Inc. and Lear Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALV vs. LEA - Profitability Comparison
ALV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 509.00M and revenue of 2.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
LEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of -442.10M and revenue of 6.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.1%.
ALV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 192.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.
LEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of -259.80M and revenue of 6.21B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
ALV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 100.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
LEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 192.80M and revenue of 6.21B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALV and LEA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEA has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to ALV (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALV dropped -79.72% vs LEA's -64.51%.
LEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALV and LEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer