ALTL vs. ACGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) and ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ALTL tracks the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index while ACGR tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ALTL returned 5.04%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for ACGR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALTL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ACGR.

Performance

ALTL vs. ACGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTL achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than ACGR's 7.39% return.

ALTL

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 12.43%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 44.84%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: —

ACGR

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTL vs. ACGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	16.90%	16.61%	12.30%	-15.85%	-10.67%	45.30%	33.74%
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	7.39%	14.50%	26.66%	43.24%	-30.13%	39.24%	15.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTL and ACGR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020	0.54

The correlation between ALTL and ACGR shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ALTL vs. ACGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 78
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 74
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ACGR

ACGR Risk / Return Rank: 40
ACGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ACGR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ACGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACGR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTL vs. ACGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) and American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALTL	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.57	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	2.17	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.27	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	1.53	+3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.35	5.20	+11.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALTL vs. ACGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the ACGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTL and ACGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALTL	ACGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	1.57	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.70	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.70	+0.03

Drawdowns

ALTL vs. ACGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTL drawdown since its inception was -31.91%, smaller than the maximum ACGR drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTL and ACGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTL	ACGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.91%	-34.54%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-15.84%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.21%	-24.58%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.91%	-34.54%	+2.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-1.68%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.58%	-8.50%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	4.66%	-1.91%

Volatility

ALTL vs. ACGR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) at 3.65%. This indicates that ALTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALTL	ACGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	3.65%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	11.95%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	15.49%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	21.51%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.09%	21.42%	-1.33%

ALTL vs. ACGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGR's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALTL vs. ACGR - Dividend Comparison

ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than ACGR's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	0.09%	0.11%	0.23%	0.37%	0.48%	0.58%	1.44%
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.94%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALTL and ACGR in my portfolio?

ALTL and ACGR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALTL or ACGR?

ALTL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ACGR (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTL dropped -31.91% vs ACGR's -34.54%.

Which ETF is better, ALTL or ACGR?

On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 15.06% vs 5.04% for ALTL. On fees, ACGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ACGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALTL or ACGR?

Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALTL or ACGR?

ACGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALTL or ACGR?

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.

What is the main difference between ALTL and ACGR?

ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index, while ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ALTL and 0.39% for ACGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.