ALRG vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ALRG is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

ALRG vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRG achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.

ALRG

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 9.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	9.39%	11.95%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	25.81%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and FTIF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.44

ALRG vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALRG	FTIF
Technology	39.8%	4.1%
Financial Services	14.2%	-
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Industrials	10.4%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	3.2%
Healthcare	5.6%	-
Energy	5.3%	44.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	20.1%
Real Estate	-	12.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALRG vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALRG	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.75	+1.26

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-27.83%	+18.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.50%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-6.00%	+4.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	15.00%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	18.96%	-6.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.52%	18.96%	-6.44%

ALRG vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FTIF's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.43%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.11%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and FTIF in my portfolio?

ALRG and FTIF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or FTIF?

On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or FTIF?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.43% for ALRG.

What is the main difference between ALRG and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 0.60% for FTIF.