ALRG vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ALRG (Allspring LT Large Core ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ALRG is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALRG charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

ALRG vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ALRG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 5.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.18%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALRG vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	5.94%	11.78%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ALRG and DFND is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.10

ALRG vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ALRG	DFND
Technology	33.5%	24.8%
Financial Services	13.1%	18.2%
Industrials	11.1%	17.1%
Communication Services	10.1%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	3.5%
Healthcare	6.2%	10.7%
Energy	2.4%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.2%
Basic Materials	0.8%	4.3%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ALRG vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALRG	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.08	—

Drawdowns

ALRG vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRG drawdown since its inception was -9.27%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRG and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALRG	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-22.65%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-3.69%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-5.70%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALRG	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	10.88%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	22.44%	-9.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.84%	19.08%	-6.24%

ALRG vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALRG has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALRG vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

ALRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALRG Allspring LT Large Core ETF	0.44%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALRG and DFND in my portfolio?

ALRG and DFND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ALRG or DFND?

On fees, ALRG is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALRG or DFND?

ALRG is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALRG or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.44% for ALRG.

What is the main difference between ALRG and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for ALRG and 1.50% for DFND.