PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALOIX vs. BINCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus International Small-Cap Fund (ALOIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALOIX achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly higher than BINCX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ALOIX has underperformed BINCX with an annualized return of 7.84%, while BINCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.


ALOIX

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.16%
YTD
15.15%
6M
18.70%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
7.84%

BINCX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
0.81%
6M
2.98%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
28.34%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALOIX
Virtus International Small-Cap Fund
15.15%36.22%2.65%19.43%-26.96%6.02%15.92%24.57%-22.78%37.59%
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
0.81%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ALOIX and BINCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.77

The correlation between ALOIX and BINCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALOIX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALOIX
ALOIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ALOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ALOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus International Small-Cap Fund (ALOIX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALOIXBINCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.22

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.27

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

3.75

+9.65

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALOIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the BINCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALOIX and BINCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALOIXBINCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.20

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.18

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.70

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.64

-0.34

Drawdowns

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALOIX drawdown since its inception was -79.29%, which is greater than BINCX's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALOIX and BINCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALOIXBINCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.29%

-48.15%

-31.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-11.66%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-11.66%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.41%

-31.97%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-48.15%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-7.44%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-9.40%

-25.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.94%

-1.27%

Volatility

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus International Small-Cap Fund (ALOIX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) at 3.13%. This indicates that ALOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALOIXBINCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.13%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

9.99%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

12.38%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

13.88%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

14.25%

+2.40%

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALOIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALOIX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison

ALOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than BINCX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALOIX
Virtus International Small-Cap Fund
3.94%4.54%3.50%4.93%1.25%19.08%1.38%1.62%18.17%1.52%1.04%0.54%
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
2.99%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALOIX and BINCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALOIX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to BINCX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALOIX dropped -79.29% vs BINCX's -48.15%.

ALOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALOIX and BINCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer