PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALL vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALL achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


ALL

1D
-0.53%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.38%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
26.62%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
14.49%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ALL
The Allstate Corporation
1.61%10.09%40.61%6.37%18.37%9.86%20.39%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ALL and QQQM is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.13

The correlation between ALL and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALL
ALL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ALL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ALL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Allstate Corporation (ALL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.45

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.53

-3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

13.52

-13.19

ALL vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALL Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALL and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.65

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.82

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.85

-0.48

Drawdowns

ALL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALL drawdown since its inception was -77.03%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALL and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.03%

-35.04%

-41.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.96%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.11%

-22.70%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

-35.04%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-0.20%

-6.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.44%

-8.25%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

3.11%

+1.96%

Volatility

ALL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The Allstate Corporation (ALL) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that ALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

4.48%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.20%

12.05%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

15.91%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.32%

22.24%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

22.12%

+2.75%

Dividends

ALL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

ALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALL
The Allstate Corporation
2.46%1.92%1.91%2.54%2.51%2.75%1.96%1.78%2.23%1.41%1.78%1.93%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALL and QQQM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALL has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALL dropped -77.03% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALL and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer