ALIBX vs. SMCVX
ALIBX (ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund) and SMCVX (ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - ALIBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by ALPS, while SMCVX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by ALPS. Over the past 5 years, ALIBX returned 7.09%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for SMCVX. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ALIBX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for SMCVX.
Performance
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIBX achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than SMCVX's 0.73% return.
ALIBX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.61%
SMCVX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 8.19% | 12.89% | 14.89% | 16.01% | -16.24% | 15.50% | 6.33% |
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund | 0.73% | 5.21% | 4.93% | 7.29% | -12.95% | 2.62% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIBX and SMCVX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ALIBX and SMCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIBX vs. SMCVX — Risk / Return Rank
ALIBX
SMCVX
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) and ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALIBX | SMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.34 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 6.03 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIBX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, which is greater than SMCVX's maximum drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIBX and SMCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIBX | SMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -16.11% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -2.71% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -3.71% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.38% | -16.11% | -4.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -0.75% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -4.86% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 0.60% | +1.04% |
Volatility
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) at 0.62%. This indicates that ALIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIBX | SMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 0.62% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 2.39% | +5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.46% | 2.85% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 4.18% | +7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 3.99% | +7.00% |
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIBX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCVX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIBX vs. SMCVX - Dividend Comparison
ALIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than SMCVX's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 8.39% | 9.14% | 10.61% | 1.37% | 1.08% | 0.56% | 0.12% |
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund | 4.86% | 4.74% | 4.60% | 4.15% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALIBX and SMCVX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALIBX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to SMCVX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIBX dropped -20.38% vs SMCVX's -16.11%.
ALIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALIBX and SMCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer