SMCVX vs. AVPEX
SMCVX (ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund) and AVPEX (ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SMCVX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by ALPS, while AVPEX is a Global Equities fund managed by ALPS. Over the past 5 years, SMCVX returned 0.89%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for AVPEX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCVX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for AVPEX.
Performance
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCVX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than AVPEX's -8.64% return.
SMCVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AVPEX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -10.38%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 1Y
- -10.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund | 1.06% | 5.21% | 4.93% | 7.29% | -12.95% | 2.62% | 4.69% |
AVPEX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio | -8.64% | 1.46% | 18.06% | 28.80% | -28.96% | 24.03% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCVX and AVPEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between SMCVX and AVPEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCVX vs. AVPEX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCVX
AVPEX
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio (AVPEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCVX | AVPEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.91 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | -0.51 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | -1.07 | +8.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCVX drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum AVPEX drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCVX and AVPEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCVX | AVPEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -46.42% | +30.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -22.41% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.73% | -22.41% | +18.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -37.50% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -13.20% | +12.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -8.66% | +3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 10.69% | -10.10% |
Volatility
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) is 0.63%, while ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio (AVPEX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that SMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVPEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCVX | AVPEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 4.89% | -4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 15.20% | -12.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 18.33% | -15.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 19.00% | -14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 18.96% | -14.96% |
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCVX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AVPEX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCVX vs. AVPEX - Dividend Comparison
SMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than AVPEX's 9.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVPEX ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Portfolio | 9.31% | 8.50% | 8.83% | 0.00% | 31.03% | 4.24% | 13.52% | 3.02% | 6.79% | 2.33% | 0.75% | 0.11% |
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund | 4.90% | 4.74% | 4.60% | 4.15% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCVX and AVPEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVPEX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to SMCVX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCVX dropped -16.11% vs AVPEX's -46.42%.
SMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCVX and AVPEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer