SMCVX vs. SMTRX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX).

SMCVX is managed by ALPS. It was launched on Sep 14, 2020. SMTRX is managed by ALPS. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018.

Performance

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund	-0.56%	5.21%	4.93%	7.29%	-12.95%	2.62%	4.69%
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund	-0.26%	6.80%	2.19%	5.94%	-13.49%	-1.33%	1.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCVX achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than SMTRX's -0.26% return.

SMCVX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: -0.56%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 3.75%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

SMTRX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.93%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCVX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SMTRX's 0.99% expense ratio.

SMCVX

ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund

SMTRX

ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund

Return for Risk

SMCVX vs. SMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCVX

SMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 50
SMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
SMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SMTRX

SMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 36
SMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCVX	SMTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.91	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	1.29	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.46	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	4.38	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the SMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCVX and SMTRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCVX	SMTRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.91	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.03	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.39	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between SMCVX and SMTRX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Dividend Comparison

SMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than SMTRX's 4.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund	5.06%	4.74%	4.60%	4.15%	2.21%	2.40%	0.75%	0.00%
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund	4.21%	4.16%	4.27%	3.82%	1.51%	1.23%	3.31%	1.77%

Drawdowns

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCVX drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum SMTRX drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCVX and SMTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCVX	SMTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.11%	-18.11%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.94%	-2.77%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.11%	-18.11%	+2.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-1.90%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-5.14%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.92%	-0.16%

Volatility

SMCVX vs. SMTRX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX) have volatilities of 1.67% and 1.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCVX	SMTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	1.61%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	2.46%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	4.12%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.14%	5.34%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.05%	4.83%	-0.78%