PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCVX vs. SMRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCVX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than SMRSX's 0.91% return.


SMCVX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.79%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.95%

SMRSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.03%
6M
0.71%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMCVX
ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund
0.96%5.21%4.93%7.29%-12.95%2.62%4.69%
SMRSX
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund
0.91%5.38%4.50%4.73%-3.47%-0.39%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCVX and SMRSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020

0.63

The correlation between SMCVX and SMRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCVX vs. SMRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMCVX
SMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SMRSX
SMRSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SMRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCVXSMRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.96

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

12.00

-5.78

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the SMRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCVX and SMRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCVX drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than SMRSX's maximum drawdown of -5.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCVX and SMRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCVXSMRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-5.62%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-0.95%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.71%

-0.95%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

-5.62%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.06%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-0.84%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.23%

+0.37%

Volatility

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund (SMRSX) at 0.38%. This indicates that SMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCVXSMRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.38%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

1.10%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

1.32%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.18%

1.71%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

1.58%

+2.41%

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCVX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SMRSX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCVX vs. SMRSX - Dividend Comparison

SMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than SMRSX's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMCVX
ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund
4.85%4.74%4.60%4.15%2.21%2.40%0.75%0.00%0.00%
SMRSX
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund
3.86%3.95%4.11%3.50%0.84%0.56%1.92%2.86%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCVX and SMRSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCVX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to SMRSX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCVX dropped -16.11% vs SMRSX's -5.62%.

SMRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCVX and SMRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer