PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALHC vs. ANF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALHC vs. ANF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC (ALHC) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALHC achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -31.62% return.


ALHC

1D
-2.61%
1M
30.21%
YTD
7.80%
6M
5.45%
1Y
52.51%
3Y*
51.69%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*

ANF

1D
-1.34%
1M
11.40%
YTD
-31.62%
6M
-30.99%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
32.58%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALHC vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC
7.80%75.56%30.66%-26.79%-16.36%-26.19%
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
-31.62%-15.79%69.43%285.07%-34.22%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ALHC and ANF is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALHC:

$4.54B

ANF:

$3.93B

EPS

ALHC:

$0.10

ANF:

$10.45

PE Ratio

ALHC:

222.93

ANF:

8.24

PS Ratio

ALHC:

1.04

ANF:

0.77

PB Ratio

ALHC:

21.93

ANF:

2.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALHC:

$4.26B

ANF:

$5.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALHC:

$365.25M

ANF:

$2.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALHC:

$66.34M

ANF:

$727.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALHC vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALHC
ALHC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ALHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALHC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ALHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALHC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ANF
ANF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALHC vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC (ALHC) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALHCANFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

0.23

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

0.42

+3.21

ALHC vs. ANF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the ANF Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALHC and ANF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALHC vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALHC drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, roughly equal to the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALHC and ANF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALHCANFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.61%

-86.59%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.14%

-45.65%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.33%

-65.89%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.57%

-69.93%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.93%

-55.25%

+33.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.00%

-42.91%

-9.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.52%

24.84%

-10.32%

Volatility

ALHC vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison

Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC (ALHC) has a higher volatility of 29.89% compared to Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) at 16.92%. This indicates that ALHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALHCANFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.89%

16.92%

+12.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.02%

38.35%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.83%

62.05%

-6.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.64%

61.09%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.90%

61.05%

+2.85%

Dividends

ALHC vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALHC nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALHC
Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.98%4.63%3.99%4.59%6.67%2.96%

Financials

ALHC vs. ANF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.24B
1.11B
(ALHC) Total Revenue
(ANF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALHC vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
ALHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ALHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC reported an operating income of 15.50M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

ANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

ALHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alignment Healthcare Holdings, LLC reported a net income of 11.42M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

ANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALHC and ANF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALHC has higher volatility (29.89%) compared to ANF (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALHC dropped -83.61% vs ANF's -86.59%.

ALHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALHC and ANF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer