ALAB vs. STRL
ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. ALAB operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past year, ALAB returned 127.62% vs 123.02% for STRL. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ALAB vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 87.08% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 94.88% return.
ALAB
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- -27.77%
- 6M
- 106.63%
- YTD
- 87.08%
- 1Y
- 127.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 112.28%
STRL
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -23.15%
- 6M
- 66.74%
- YTD
- 94.88%
- 1Y
- 123.02%
- 3Y*
- 111.61%
- 5Y*
- 93.57%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26B | $1.54B | $1.91B | |
| $512.00M | $493.44M | $636.07M |
ALAB vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. | 87.08% | 25.60% | 152.00% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 94.88% | 81.79% | 55.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAB and STRL is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | 0.47 |
The correlation between ALAB and STRL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ALAB:
$53.35B
STRL:
$18.31B
ALAB:
$1.48
STRL:
$11.16
ALAB:
210.48
STRL:
53.46
ALAB:
56.25
STRL:
6.42
ALAB:
37.74
STRL:
15.57
ALAB:
$1.00B
STRL:
$2.88B
ALAB:
$760.99M
STRL:
$664.66M
ALAB:
$253.12M
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAB vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
ALAB
STRL
ALAB vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALAB | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 8.00 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALAB vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum STRL drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAB | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -92.51% | +28.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.19% | -50.26% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.57% | -39.95% | +4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -46.20% | +17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.79% | 15.44% | +16.35% |
Volatility
ALAB vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 34.17% compared to Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) at 31.97%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAB | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.17% | 31.97% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.73% | 71.75% | +5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.79% | 88.81% | +11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.32% | 58.94% | +36.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.32% | 54.66% | +40.66% |
Dividends
ALAB vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ALAB vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALAB vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
ALAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
ALAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
ALAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAB and STRL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAB has higher volatility (34.17%) compared to STRL (31.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs STRL's -92.51%.
STRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALAB and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer