PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAF vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AKAF vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.


AKAF

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.37%
YTD
11.65%
6M
12.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAF vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AKAF and BDVL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAF vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AKAF vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKAFBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.25

1.01

+1.24

Drawdowns

AKAF vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAFBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-7.71%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.95%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-1.19%

-0.44%

Volatility

AKAF vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAFBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

9.49%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

9.49%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

9.49%

+5.17%

AKAF vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AKAF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AKAF vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than BDVL's 2.66% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAF and BDVL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AKAF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AKAF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.11% for AKAF.

AKAF tracks Alaska Last Frontier Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Prospr Aligned and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AKAF and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAF and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer