AKAF vs. WBIG
AKAF (The Frontier Economic Fund) and WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AKAF is passively managed, while WBIG is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AKAF charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for WBIG.
Performance
AKAF vs. WBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKAF achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than WBIG's 9.54% return.
AKAF
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
AKAF vs. WBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 8.51% | 17.17% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 9.54% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKAF and WBIG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKAF vs. WBIG — Risk / Return Rank
AKAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WBIG
AKAF vs. WBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Frontier Economic Fund (AKAF) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKAF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKAF vs. WBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKAF drawdown since its inception was -9.32%, smaller than the maximum WBIG drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAF and WBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKAF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -25.32% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.42% | -4.07% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -10.89% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
AKAF vs. WBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKAF | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 10.12% | +4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 12.05% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 11.56% | +3.47% |
AKAF vs. WBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AKAF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIG's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
AKAF vs. WBIG - Dividend Comparison
AKAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than WBIG's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKAF The Frontier Economic Fund | 3.04% | 2.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.20% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKAF and WBIG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AKAF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AKAF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
AKAF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.20% for WBIG.
They also come from different issuers: Prospr Aligned and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AKAF and 1.14% for WBIG.
Find the right allocation for AKAF and WBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer