PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AJG vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -17.35% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AJG has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 17.92%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.


AJG

1D
-1.67%
1M
7.22%
YTD
-17.35%
6M
-10.08%
1Y
-34.63%
3Y*
1.87%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
17.92%

LMT

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.35%
YTD
8.80%
6M
13.08%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-17.35%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
8.80%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and LMT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 1984

0.21

The correlation between AJG and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AJG:

$5.74

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

AJG:

37.04

LMT:

25.23

PS Ratio

AJG:

3.97

LMT:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

AJG:

$13.94B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AJG:

$7.63B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

AJG:

$3.66B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJGLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.10

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

0.43

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

1.04

-2.51

AJG vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJGLMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

0.41

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.40

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.46

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.38

+0.09

Drawdowns

AJG vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-79.29%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.64%

-25.15%

-15.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-31.79%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-31.79%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

-36.67%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.26%

-22.64%

-15.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.83%

-26.84%

+14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.06%

10.51%

+13.55%

Volatility

AJG vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.31%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

5.31%

+3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

19.60%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.95%

26.62%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

22.88%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

23.72%

-0.64%

Dividends

AJG vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than LMT's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.27%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.62%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

AJG vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.63B
18.02B
(AJG) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AJG vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.1%
11.5%
Portfolio components
AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and LMT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to LMT (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer