PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJG vs. GDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJG vs. GDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJG achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than GDIV's 12.76% return.


AJG

1D
-0.26%
1M
15.73%
6M
-3.73%
YTD
-1.58%
1Y
-17.85%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
19.71%

GDIV

1D
0.28%
1M
1.11%
6M
10.10%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
22.49%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJG vs. GDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-1.58%-8.03%27.34%20.51%22.68%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
12.76%10.81%14.83%16.45%-1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AJG and GDIV is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2022

0.37

The correlation between AJG and GDIV shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJG vs. GDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GDIV
GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJG vs. GDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJGGDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

2.30

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

9.54

-10.34

AJG vs. GDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the GDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJG and GDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJG vs. GDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJG drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, which is greater than GDIV's maximum drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJG and GDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJGGDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-18.93%

-38.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.64%

-9.67%

-28.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.40%

-18.93%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.47%

0.00%

-26.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-3.11%

-9.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.93%

2.33%

+20.60%

Volatility

AJG vs. GDIV - Volatility Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) at 2.85%. This indicates that AJG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJGGDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

2.85%

+6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.66%

9.33%

+14.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.22%

11.86%

+17.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

15.20%

+8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.16%

15.20%

+7.96%

Dividends

AJG vs. GDIV - Dividend Comparison

AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than GDIV's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.07%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.13%1.19%1.30%2.27%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AJG and GDIV have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to GDIV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJG dropped -57.49% vs GDIV's -18.93%.

GDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJG and GDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer