PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJAN vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJAN vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than ARLU's 8.24% return.


AJAN

1D
0.30%
1M
0.61%
6M
2.18%
YTD
2.59%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.30%

ARLU

1D
1.77%
1M
3.12%
6M
7.33%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$92.46K$76.38K$85.38K
$99.89K$131.60K$99.19K

AJAN vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and ARLU is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024

0.77

The correlation between AJAN and ARLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJAN vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AJAN
AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AJAN vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AJANARLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.65

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

6.90

+3.79

AJAN vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and ARLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and ARLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJANARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-15.38%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-9.66%

+7.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-2.21%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

2.31%

-1.84%

Volatility

AJAN vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) is 0.88%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that AJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJANARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.74%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

9.53%

-7.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

11.99%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

12.61%

-8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

12.61%

-8.84%

AJAN vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARLU's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AJAN vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJAN nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AJAN and ARLU have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARLU has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to AJAN (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs ARLU's -15.38%.

On 1-year performance, ARLU leads with 15.92% vs 4.98% for AJAN. On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARLU has performed better with a 15.92% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

AJAN and ARLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.74% for ARLU.

AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJAN and ARLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer