PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARLU vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARLU vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARLU achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 7.18% return.


ARLU

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
5.16%
6M
4.76%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.26%
YTD
7.18%
6M
7.27%
1Y
14.72%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARLU vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARLU and DMAR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024

0.91

The correlation between ARLU and DMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARLU vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARLU vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARLUDMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.99

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

9.66

-7.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

57.32

-49.05

ARLU vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLU and DMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARLU vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLU drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLU and DMAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARLUDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-9.84%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-1.53%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-0.19%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-1.84%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

0.26%

+1.94%

Volatility

ARLU vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.39%. This indicates that ARLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARLUDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

1.39%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

3.02%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

3.76%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

7.05%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.64%

6.96%

+5.68%

ARLU vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARLU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARLU vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARLU nor DMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARLU and DMAR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARLU has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to DMAR (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLU dropped -15.38% vs DMAR's -9.84%.

On 1-year performance, ARLU leads with 18.18% vs 14.72% for DMAR. On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, DMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARLU has performed better with a 18.18% return vs 14.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.

ARLU and DMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ARLU and 0.85% for DMAR.

DMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARLU and DMAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer