ARLU vs. SIXJ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ARLU (Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF) and SIXJ (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. ARLU is actively managed, while SIXJ is passively managed. Over the past year, ARLU returned 15.22% vs 14.68% for SIXJ. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARLU achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SIXJ's 7.62% return.

ARLU

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 4.54%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.42%

SIXJ

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 6.58%
• YTD: 7.62%
• 1Y: 14.68%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF	$105.43K	$124.71K	$97.74K
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	$756.80K	$654.16K	$752.33K

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ARLU Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF	6.36%	11.27%	8.80%
SIXJ AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF	7.62%	12.81%	9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ARLU and SIXJ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.93

The correlation between ARLU and SIXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARLU vs. SIXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARLU

ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 48
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SIXJ

SIXJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
SIXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SIXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SIXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SIXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SIXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARLU	SIXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.49	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	3.62	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.51	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	3.25	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	17.32	-10.72

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SIXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLU and SIXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLU drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than SIXJ's maximum drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLU and SIXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARLU	SIXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-14.07%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-4.53%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	0.00%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-2.78%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	0.85%	+1.46%

Volatility

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) at 2.07%. This indicates that ARLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARLU	SIXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	2.07%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	5.03%	+4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	5.93%	+5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.57%	9.91%	+2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.57%	9.91%	+2.66%

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARLU and SIXJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

ARLU vs. SIXJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARLU nor SIXJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARLU and SIXJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ARLU and SIXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ARLU or SIXJ?

ARLU has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to SIXJ (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLU dropped -15.38% vs SIXJ's -14.07%.

Which ETF is better, ARLU or SIXJ?

On 1-year performance, ARLU leads with 15.22% vs 14.68% for SIXJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, SIXJ has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARLU or SIXJ?

Over the 1-year period, ARLU has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARLU or SIXJ?

ARLU and SIXJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARLU or SIXJ?

ARLU and SIXJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.