AJAN vs. APRP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AJAN returned 4.82% vs 16.03% for APRP. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APRP.

Performance

AJAN vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 10.37% return.

AJAN

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 1Y: 4.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.17%

APRP

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 9.79%
• YTD: 10.37%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026	$57.65K	$63.63K	$78.33K
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	$91.31K	$121.65K	$127.34K

AJAN vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026	2.19%	6.12%	5.40%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	10.37%	7.80%	10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AJAN and APRP is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.78

The correlation between AJAN and APRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AJAN vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AJAN

AJAN Risk / Return Rank: 78
AJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
AJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 82
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AJAN vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AJAN	APRP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.65	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.48	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.61	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.54	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	31.67	-21.63

AJAN vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJAN and APRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AJAN vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AJAN	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-13.66%	+9.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.24%	-6.07%	+3.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	0.00%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-1.19%	+0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.49%	-0.02%

Volatility

AJAN vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) is 0.84%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that AJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AJAN	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	1.38%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.38%	9.06%	-6.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56%	9.38%	-6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.77%	10.70%	-6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	10.70%	-6.93%

AJAN vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AJAN vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJAN nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AJAN and APRP in my portfolio?

AJAN and APRP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AJAN or APRP?

APRP has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to AJAN (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs APRP's -13.66%.

Which ETF is better, AJAN or APRP?

On 1-year performance, APRP leads with 16.03% vs 4.82% for AJAN. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AJAN or APRP?

Over the 1-year period, APRP has performed better with a 16.03% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AJAN or APRP?

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AJAN or APRP?

AJAN and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AJAN and APRP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.50% for APRP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.