PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 56.92% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 15.10%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
3.37%
1M
0.06%
6M
47.24%
YTD
56.92%
1Y
96.84%
3Y*
42.42%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
15.10%
ALL TIME*
15.34%

HDV

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.46%
6M
10.00%
YTD
19.66%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
9.57%
ALL TIME*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$721.94K$1.14M$2.79M
$168.30M$156.51M$108.57M

AIVC vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
56.92%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
19.66%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and HDV is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.29

The correlation between AIVC and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVC vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVC
HDV

Technology

91.0%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
9.3%

Communication Services

2.1%
5.2%

Industrials

1.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Energy

-

19.8%

Healthcare

-

23.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

8.2%

Technology

AIVC
91.0%
HDV
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVC
5.0%
HDV
9.3%

Communication Services

AIVC
2.1%
HDV
5.2%

Industrials

AIVC
1.7%
HDV
2.8%

Financial Services

AIVC
0.0%
HDV
4.7%

Basic Materials

AIVC

-

HDV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

AIVC

-

HDV
24.3%

Energy

AIVC

-

HDV
19.8%

Healthcare

AIVC

-

HDV
23.9%

Real Estate

AIVC

-

HDV

-

Utilities

AIVC

-

HDV
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIVC vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVCHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

4.90

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

13.39

+1.31

AIVC vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-37.04%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-5.18%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-10.49%

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-15.42%

-38.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-37.04%

-19.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.72%

-1.72%

-12.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-3.06%

-13.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

1.89%

+4.72%

Volatility

AIVC vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.52%. This indicates that AIVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.60%

4.52%

+9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.91%

8.66%

+21.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.27%

10.83%

+24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.40%

12.95%

+18.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.52%

15.79%

+11.73%

AIVC vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than HDV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.11%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.08%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVC and HDV have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVC has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to HDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, AIVC leads with 15.10% vs 9.57% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDV is Dividend. AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.08% for HDV.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer