AIVC vs. BATT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. AIVC is passively managed, while BATT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIVC returned 20.46%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for BATT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

AIVC vs. BATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 79.45% return, which is significantly higher than BATT's 26.16% return.

AIVC

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 30.74%
• YTD: 79.45%
• 6M: 79.35%
• 1Y: 151.70%
• 3Y*: 51.42%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

BATT

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 26.16%
• 6M: 29.61%
• 1Y: 103.56%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. BATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	79.45%	39.94%	18.22%	39.28%	-38.91%	-7.23%	41.45%	27.78%	-17.66%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	26.16%	59.70%	-13.93%	-7.05%	-32.25%	16.52%	44.43%	-2.40%	-42.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and BATT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018	0.64

The correlation between AIVC and BATT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVC vs. BATT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIVC	BATT
Technology	91.2%	5.6%
Communication Services	4.6%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	18.9%
Financial Services	0.8%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	57.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	16.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIVC vs. BATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BATT

BATT Risk / Return Rank: 87
BATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BATT Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BATT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. BATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIVC	BATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.14	3.38	+1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.21	3.69	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.50	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.82	6.12	+4.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.63	22.20	+14.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIVC vs. BATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is higher than the BATT Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and BATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIVC	BATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.14	3.38	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.12	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.01	+0.63

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. BATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, smaller than the maximum BATT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and BATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVC	BATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.11%	-69.38%	+13.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	-17.03%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	-47.65%	+15.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.58%	-61.98%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-3.44%	+2.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-34.78%	+18.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	4.68%	-0.52%

Volatility

AIVC vs. BATT - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a higher volatility of 11.07% compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) at 10.29%. This indicates that AIVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIVC	BATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.07%	10.29%	+0.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.72%	24.67%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.71%	30.80%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.20%	29.57%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	30.60%	-3.67%

AIVC vs. BATT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIVC and BATT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

AIVC vs. BATT - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than BATT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF	1.47%	1.85%	3.17%	3.23%	4.14%	2.32%	0.21%	3.22%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVC and BATT in my portfolio?

AIVC and BATT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIVC or BATT?

AIVC has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to BATT (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs BATT's -69.38%.

Which ETF is better, AIVC or BATT?

On 5-year performance, AIVC leads with 20.46% vs 3.45% for BATT. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, BATT has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIVC or BATT?

Over the 5-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVC or BATT?

AIVC and BATT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVC or BATT?

BATT has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between AIVC and BATT?

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while BATT is Commodity Producers Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs 3.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.