AIVC vs. ASMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AIVC tracks the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIVC returned 151.70% vs 130.11% for ASMH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIVC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

AIVC vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 79.45% return, which is significantly higher than ASMH's 63.99% return.

AIVC

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 30.74%
• YTD: 79.45%
• 6M: 79.35%
• 1Y: 151.70%
• 3Y*: 51.42%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

ASMH

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 25.24%
• YTD: 63.99%
• 6M: 53.18%
• 1Y: 130.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	79.45%	65.26%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	63.99%	58.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and ASMH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.65

The correlation between AIVC and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AIVC vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIVC	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.14	3.36	+1.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.21	3.81	+1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.47	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.82	8.24	+2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	36.63	21.26	+15.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIVC vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 5.14, which is higher than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIVC	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.14	3.36	+1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	3.59	-2.95

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVC	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.11%	-15.89%	-40.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	-15.89%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	0.00%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-4.33%	-12.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	6.14%	-1.98%

Volatility

AIVC vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) is 11.07%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that AIVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIVC	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.07%	13.84%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.72%	30.43%	-6.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.71%	38.94%	-9.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.20%	38.32%	-8.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	38.32%	-11.39%

AIVC vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVC vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than ASMH's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	0.99%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVC and ASMH in my portfolio?

AIVC and ASMH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIVC or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to AIVC (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, AIVC or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, AIVC leads with 151.70% vs 130.11% for ASMH. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 11.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIVC or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 151.70% return vs 130.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVC or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVC or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between AIVC and ASMH?

AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.