AIVC vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AIVC is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIVC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

AIVC vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AIVC

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 30.74%
• YTD: 79.45%
• 6M: 79.35%
• 1Y: 151.70%
• 3Y*: 51.42%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	10.24%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

AIVC vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIVC	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.14	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.21	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.82	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	36.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIVC	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	471,500.14	-471,499.50

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVC	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.11%	-1.61%	-54.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	0.00%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.43%	-0.40%	-16.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIVC	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.71%	113.00%	-83.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.20%	113.00%	-82.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	113.00%	-86.07%

AIVC vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVC vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVC and ARMH in my portfolio?

AIVC and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIVC or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVC or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVC or ARMH?

AIVC has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between AIVC and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.19% for ARMH.