PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIT vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIT vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIT achieves a 23.56% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AIT has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 23.22%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.


AIT

1D
-1.23%
1M
2.93%
YTD
23.56%
6M
22.12%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
29.00%
10Y*
23.22%

CB

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.18%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.22%
1Y
15.46%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIT vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
23.56%8.01%39.67%38.35%24.25%33.57%19.37%26.35%-19.41%16.89%
CB
Chubb Limited
5.39%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AIT and CB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993

0.31

The correlation between AIT and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIT:

$12.02B

CB:

$129.01B

EPS

AIT:

$10.56

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

AIT:

29.94

CB:

11.53

PEG Ratio

AIT:

0.94

CB:

0.80

PS Ratio

AIT:

2.50

CB:

2.71

PB Ratio

AIT:

4.02

CB:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIT:

$4.84B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIT:

$1.47B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

AIT:

$563.38M

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIT vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIT
AIT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIT vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AITCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.17

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.66

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

3.77

+3.95

AIT vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIT and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIT vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIT drawdown since its inception was -66.47%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIT and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AITCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-50.99%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-9.36%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.42%

-14.35%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-19.26%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-42.59%

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-4.03%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-10.68%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

4.11%

+1.23%

Volatility

AIT vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 5.99%. This indicates that AIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AITCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

5.99%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

12.76%

+6.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.52%

17.66%

+8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.53%

20.33%

+10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.30%

23.69%

+9.61%

Dividends

AIT vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

AIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than CB's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
0.61%0.72%0.62%0.81%1.08%1.29%1.64%1.86%2.22%1.70%1.89%2.67%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.20%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%

Financials

AIT vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.25B
1.88B
(AIT) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AIT and CB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIT has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to CB (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIT dropped -66.47% vs CB's -50.99%.

AIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIT and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer