PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AIT vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AITCOST
YTD Return59.52%42.08%
1Y Return71.09%65.88%
3Y Return (Ann)38.88%23.55%
5Y Return (Ann)36.43%27.30%
10Y Return (Ann)20.90%23.65%
Sharpe Ratio2.483.37
Sortino Ratio3.474.00
Omega Ratio1.441.60
Calmar Ratio5.986.44
Martin Ratio15.1716.66
Ulcer Index4.63%3.97%
Daily Std Dev28.30%19.61%
Max Drawdown-66.46%-53.39%
Current Drawdown-0.48%-1.21%

Fundamentals


AITCOST
Market Cap$10.53B$413.11B
EPS$9.80$16.61
PE Ratio27.9556.13
PEG Ratio2.885.66
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.48B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.31B$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$549.83M$10.63B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between AIT and COST is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AIT vs. COST - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AIT achieves a 59.52% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 42.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AIT has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 20.90%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
40.20%
20.19%
AIT
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AIT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AIT, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AIT, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AIT, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AIT, currently valued at 5.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AIT, currently valued at 15.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.17
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 4.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 16.66, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0016.66

AIT vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIT and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.48
3.37
AIT
COST

Dividends

AIT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

AIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than COST's 2.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
0.53%0.81%1.08%1.29%1.64%1.86%2.22%1.70%1.89%2.67%2.19%1.87%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.09%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

AIT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIT drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIT and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.48%
-1.21%
AIT
COST

Volatility

AIT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) has a higher volatility of 14.38% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.56%. This indicates that AIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.38%
4.56%
AIT
COST

Financials

AIT vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items