AIS vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

AIS vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIS achieves a 90.47% return, which is significantly higher than POW's 38.93% return.

AIS

• 1D: -5.97%
• 1M: -6.35%
• 6M: 76.19%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 1Y: 156.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	90.47%	-6.11%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AIS and POW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

AIS vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 95
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIS	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.67	—	—

Drawdowns

AIS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIS and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIS	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-18.37%	-14.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.63%	-18.37%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-4.33%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIS	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.66%	32.94%	+11.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.54%	32.94%	+9.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.54%	32.94%	+9.60%

AIS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIS and POW have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

AIS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIS and POW in my portfolio?

AIS and POW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIS or POW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIS or POW?

AIS and POW have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIS or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between AIS and POW?

AIS is categorized as Technology Equities, while POW is Actively Managed.