AIRR vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIRR returned 25.46%/yr vs 19.76%/yr for FNGS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIRR charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

AIRR vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.74% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 6.79% return.

AIRR

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 31.74%
• 6M: 28.77%
• 1Y: 65.25%
• 3Y*: 35.29%
• 5Y*: 25.46%
• 10Y*: 22.05%

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	31.74%	27.92%	33.45%	31.43%	-2.08%	33.01%	17.17%	0.73%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and FNGS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.46

The correlation between AIRR and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIRR vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIRR	FNGS
Industrials	84.6%	-
Financial Services	9.6%	10.0%
Energy	3.8%	-
Technology	0.5%	59.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AIRR vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR

AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 86
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIRR	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	0.79	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.19	+2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.15	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.01	0.75	+4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.33	2.12	+16.21

AIRR vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIRR	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.37%	-48.98%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-22.93%	+9.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.95%	-26.77%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.95%	-48.98%	+21.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-9.63%	+7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-10.85%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	8.05%	-4.48%

Volatility

AIRR vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIRR	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.32%	8.74%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.81%	17.19%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.19%	21.65%	+4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.45%	30.10%	-4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.36%	31.17%	-4.81%

AIRR vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIRR vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.18%	0.23%	0.12%	0.05%	0.10%	0.20%	0.43%	0.30%	0.08%	0.47%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIRR and FNGS in my portfolio?

AIRR and FNGS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIRR or FNGS?

AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, AIRR or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 19.76% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIRR or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 19.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIRR or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIRR or FNGS?

AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between AIRR and FNGS?

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.