AIRR vs. FLM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) and FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds from First Trust - AIRR tracks the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR) while FLM tracks the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AIRR returned 21.89%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for FLM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.

Performance

AIRR vs. FLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 31.77% return, which is significantly higher than FLM's 19.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AIRR has outperformed FLM with an annualized return of 21.89%, while FLM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.

AIRR

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 31.77%
• 6M: 31.32%
• 1Y: 65.82%
• 3Y*: 37.10%
• 5Y*: 25.40%
• 10Y*: 21.89%

FLM

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 19.89%
• 6M: 18.51%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIRR vs. FLM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	31.77%	27.92%	33.45%	31.43%	-2.08%	33.01%	17.17%	33.97%	-20.57%	16.28%
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	19.89%	13.99%	17.94%	19.36%	-9.87%	12.98%	0.51%	12.81%	-21.72%	22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and FLM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014	0.72

The correlation between AIRR and FLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIRR vs. FLM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIRR	FLM
Industrials	84.6%	37.1%
Financial Services	9.6%	-
Energy	3.8%	8.1%
Technology	0.5%	7.9%
Basic Materials	-	7.4%
Communication Services	-	0.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

AIRR vs. FLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIRR

AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 78
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FLM

FLM Risk / Return Rank: 68
FLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FLM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIRR vs. FLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIRR	FLM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.15	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.93	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.05	4.01	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.68	13.80	+4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIRR vs. FLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FLM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and FLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIRR	FLM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.15	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	0.64	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.45	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.38	+0.29

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. FLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum FLM drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and FLM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIRR	FLM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.37%	-50.07%	+7.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.09%	-7.19%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.95%	-19.14%	-8.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.95%	-23.71%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.37%	-50.07%	+7.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-0.71%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-10.84%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.08%	+1.45%

Volatility

AIRR vs. FLM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) at 4.27%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIRR	FLM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.87%	4.27%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.82%	10.39%	+9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.40%	13.45%	+11.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.29%	16.82%	+8.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	18.73%	+7.56%

AIRR vs. FLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AIRR and FLM have an expense ratio of 0.70%.

Dividends

AIRR vs. FLM - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FLM's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.18%	0.23%	0.12%	0.05%	0.10%	0.20%	0.43%	0.30%	0.08%	0.47%
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	1.01%	1.19%	1.31%	1.16%	2.10%	1.45%	2.88%	1.84%	1.74%	1.49%	2.01%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIRR and FLM in my portfolio?

AIRR and FLM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIRR or FLM?

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to FLM (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs FLM's -50.07%.

Which ETF is better, AIRR or FLM?

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 21.89% vs 8.40% for FLM. Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. On volatility, FLM has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIRR or FLM?

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 21.89% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIRR or FLM?

AIRR and FLM have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIRR or FLM?

FLM has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

What is the main difference between AIRR and FLM?

AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR), while FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.