PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIRR vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIRR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIRR achieves a 19.12% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AIRR has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 20.11%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.


AIRR

1D
1.59%
1M
-7.04%
6M
6.28%
YTD
19.12%
1Y
37.54%
3Y*
29.02%
5Y*
23.37%
10Y*
20.11%
ALL TIME*
15.59%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.28M$88.15M$93.52M
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M

AIRR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
19.12%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AIRR and FDL is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2014

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between AIRR and FDL has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AIRR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIRR
FDL

Industrials

77.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
13.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
0.4%

Technology

3.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
4.4%

Energy

1.7%
11.1%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Healthcare

-

11.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

15.4%

Industrials

AIRR
77.6%
FDL
3.6%

Financial Services

AIRR
12.1%
FDL
13.7%

Basic Materials

AIRR
3.4%
FDL
0.4%

Technology

AIRR
3.4%
FDL
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AIRR
1.9%
FDL
4.4%

Energy

AIRR
1.7%
FDL
11.1%

Communication Services

AIRR

-

FDL
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

AIRR

-

FDL
24.3%

Healthcare

AIRR

-

FDL
11.7%

Real Estate

AIRR

-

FDL

-

Utilities

AIRR

-

FDL
15.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIRR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIRR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIRRFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

6.29

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

14.86

-7.15

AIRR vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIRR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIRR and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIRR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIRR drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIRR and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIRRFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-65.93%

+23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-4.27%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

-12.24%

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-16.46%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-41.40%

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.16%

-1.96%

-10.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-9.59%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

1.81%

+2.67%

Volatility

AIRR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.96%. This indicates that AIRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIRRFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

4.96%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.37%

8.97%

+13.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

11.95%

+16.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

14.44%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

17.16%

+9.31%

AIRR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIRR has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIRR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.09%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIRR and FDL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FDL (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIRR dropped -42.37% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 20.11% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 20.11% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.09% for AIRR.

AIRR is categorized as Building & Construction, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIRR and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIRR and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer