AIPO vs. THNQ

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index while THNQ tracks the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AIPO returned 47.44% vs 60.94% for THNQ. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

AIPO vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 40.48% return.

AIPO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -5.55%
• 6M: 26.16%
• YTD: 36.26%
• 1Y: 47.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.46%

THNQ

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: 45.34%
• YTD: 40.48%
• 1Y: 60.94%
• 3Y*: 35.43%
• 5Y*: 15.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	$40.92M	$37.68M	$46.01M
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	$2.53M	$1.95M	$2.56M

AIPO vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	36.26%	9.46%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	40.48%	13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and THNQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.75

The correlation between AIPO and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIPO vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIPO	THNQ
Industrials	58.0%	1.3%
Technology	15.7%	78.5%
Utilities	15.3%	-
Energy	6.8%	-
Financial Services	2.9%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.3%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	11.1%
Communication Services	0.5%	4.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

AIPO vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIPO

AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 45
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 49

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIPO vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIPO	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.03	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.61	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.33	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	9.44	-3.03

AIPO vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIPO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIPO and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -24.36%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIPO	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.36%	-50.56%	+26.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.36%	-18.39%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.32%	-4.63%	-8.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.37%	-14.86%	+9.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.42%	6.47%	+0.95%

Volatility

AIPO vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) at 10.02%. This indicates that AIPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIPO	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.01%	10.02%	+3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.90%	24.86%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.56%	30.23%	+7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.19%	29.89%	+7.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.19%	29.01%	+8.18%

AIPO vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIPO vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIPO and THNQ in my portfolio?

AIPO and THNQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIPO or THNQ?

AIPO has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to THNQ (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIPO dropped -24.36% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, AIPO or THNQ?

On 1-year performance, THNQ leads with 60.94% vs 47.44% for AIPO. On fees, THNQ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIPO or THNQ?

Over the 1-year period, THNQ has performed better with a 60.94% return vs 47.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIPO or THNQ?

THNQ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIPO or THNQ?

THNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

What is the main difference between AIPO and THNQ?

AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.