AIPO vs. SMH
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
AIPO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 52.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
AIPO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 25.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and SMH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.81 |
AIPO vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
SMH
Industrials
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
SMH
-
Technology
AIPO
SMH
Utilities
AIPO
SMH
-
Energy
AIPO
SMH
-
Financial Services
AIPO
SMH
-
Real Estate
AIPO
SMH
-
Communication Services
AIPO
SMH
-
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
SMH
AIPO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIPO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 0.34 | +2.02 |
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -84.96% | +67.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -41.09% | +36.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 30.56% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 35.01% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 32.57% | +1.52% |
AIPO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and SMH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer