PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIPO vs. QQQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIPO vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 50.90% return, which is significantly higher than QQQT's 19.12% return.


AIPO

1D
-0.74%
1M
3.63%
YTD
50.90%
6M
40.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.44%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.27%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIPO vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIPO and QQQT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025

0.70

AIPO vs. QQQT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIPO
QQQT

Industrials

57.1%
2.8%

Technology

16.5%
54.2%

Utilities

14.4%
1.4%

Energy

6.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

3.6%
99.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
15.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

AIPO
57.1%
QQQT
2.8%

Technology

AIPO
16.5%
QQQT
54.2%

Utilities

AIPO
14.4%
QQQT
1.4%

Energy

AIPO
6.9%
QQQT
0.6%

Financial Services

AIPO
3.6%
QQQT
99.8%

Real Estate

AIPO
1.0%
QQQT
0.1%

Communication Services

AIPO
0.5%
QQQT
15.5%

Basic Materials

AIPO

-

QQQT
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AIPO

-

QQQT
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

AIPO

-

QQQT
7.6%

Healthcare

AIPO

-

QQQT
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIPO vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIPO

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIPO vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIPO vs. QQQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIPOQQQTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.30

0.98

+1.32

Drawdowns

AIPO vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum QQQT drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and QQQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIPOQQQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-22.50%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.57%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.00%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

Volatility

AIPO vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIPOQQQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.02%

14.62%

+19.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.02%

20.23%

+13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.02%

20.23%

+13.79%

AIPO vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIPO vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison

AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QQQT's 19.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
19.21%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIPO and QQQT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 19.21%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

AIPO is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQT is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 1.05% for QQQT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIPO and QQQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer