AIPO vs. ITB
AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - AIPO tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index while ITB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIPO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITB.
Performance
AIPO vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIPO achieves a 49.55% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's 1.43% return.
AIPO
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 49.55%
- 6M
- 45.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITB
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
AIPO vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 49.55% | 9.46% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.43% | -3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIPO and ITB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.25 |
AIPO vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIPO
ITB
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
AIPO
ITB
Utilities
AIPO
ITB
-
Technology
AIPO
ITB
-
Energy
AIPO
ITB
-
Financial Services
AIPO
ITB
-
Real Estate
AIPO
ITB
Communication Services
AIPO
ITB
-
Basic Materials
AIPO
-
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
AIPO
-
ITB
Consumer Defensive
AIPO
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
AIPO
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIPO vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITB
AIPO vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIPO | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIPO vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIPO drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIPO and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIPO | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -86.53% | +69.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -23.11% | +18.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -37.06% | +32.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.67% | — |
Volatility
AIPO vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIPO | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.59% | 29.94% | +5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 29.37% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 30.08% | +5.51% |
AIPO vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIPO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIPO vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
AIPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ITB's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 0.66% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIPO and ITB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AIPO and 0.38% for ITB.
Find the right allocation for AIPO and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer