AIOO vs. FEBT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) and FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz, while FEBT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIOO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FEBT.

Performance

AIOO vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIOO achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than FEBT's 7.90% return.

AIOO

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEBT

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 20.34%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIOO vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.34%	2.67%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	7.90%	8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AIOO and FEBT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

AIOO vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 81
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIOO vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIOO	FEBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.79	1.64	+1.14

Drawdowns

AIOO vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIOO drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum FEBT drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIOO and FEBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIOO	FEBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-13.19%	+12.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.34%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-1.18%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIOO	FEBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99%	7.67%	-5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.99%	9.75%	-7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.99%	9.75%	-7.76%

AIOO vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIOO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FEBT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIOO vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIOO nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIOO and FEBT in my portfolio?

AIOO and FEBT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIOO or FEBT?

On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIOO or FEBT?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIOO or FEBT?

AIOO and FEBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AIOO and FEBT?

AIOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FEBT is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AIOO and 0.74% for FEBT.