FEBT vs. FFEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB).
FEBT and FFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEBT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. FFEB is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEBT or FFEB.
Correlation
The correlation between FEBT and FFEB is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FEBT vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEBT:
2.58
FFEB:
2.44
FEBT:
3.57
FFEB:
3.38
FEBT:
1.55
FFEB:
1.51
FEBT:
3.58
FFEB:
3.43
FEBT:
18.97
FFEB:
17.20
FEBT:
0.85%
FFEB:
0.98%
FEBT:
6.31%
FFEB:
6.95%
FEBT:
-7.45%
FFEB:
-22.81%
FEBT:
0.00%
FFEB:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEBT achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's 1.71% return.
FEBT
1.00%
0.68%
6.86%
15.76%
N/A
N/A
FFEB
1.71%
1.04%
8.03%
16.66%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEBT vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEBT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEBT vs. FFEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEBT
FFEB
FEBT vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEBT vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison
Neither FEBT nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | |
---|---|---|
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF | 0.00% | 0.28% |
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEBT vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEBT drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBT and FFEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEBT vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) is 0.71%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that FEBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.