FDEC vs. DNOV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) and DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. FDEC is actively managed, while DNOV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEC returned 10.58%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for DNOV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

FDEC vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEC achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than DNOV's 4.78% return.

FDEC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.01%
• 3Y*: 15.93%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: —

DNOV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 8.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEC vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December	6.38%	14.82%	14.32%	22.76%	-9.18%	14.12%	1.37%
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November	4.78%	13.93%	10.71%	18.52%	-7.50%	6.03%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEC and DNOV is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020	0.88

The correlation between FDEC and DNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDEC vs. DNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDEC	DNOV
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FDEC vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEC

FDEC Risk / Return Rank: 81
FDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

DNOV

DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 89
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEC vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDEC	DNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.64	3.05	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	4.61	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.64	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	4.17	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.84	22.39	-4.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDEC vs. DNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the DNOV Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEC and DNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDEC	DNOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.64	3.05	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	1.07	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.91	+0.13

Drawdowns

FDEC vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEC drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, roughly equal to the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEC and DNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEC	DNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-15.03%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.83%	-4.18%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.04%	-9.98%	-3.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.67%	-9.98%	-5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.18%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-2.01%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.78%	+0.34%

Volatility

FDEC vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) at 0.84%. This indicates that FDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEC	DNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	0.84%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.92%	4.22%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.62%	5.73%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.21%	7.61%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.01%	9.04%	+1.97%

FDEC vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDEC and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

FDEC vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDEC nor DNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEC and DNOV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FDEC and DNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDEC or DNOV?

FDEC has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to DNOV (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEC dropped -15.67% vs DNOV's -15.03%.

Which ETF is better, FDEC or DNOV?

On 5-year performance, FDEC leads with 10.58% vs 8.14% for DNOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDEC or DNOV?

Over the 5-year period, FDEC has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEC or DNOV?

FDEC and DNOV have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEC or DNOV?

FDEC and DNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.