FDEC vs. SPY
FDEC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. FDEC is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEC returned 10.58%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
FDEC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEC achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
FDEC
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
FDEC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 6.38% | 14.82% | 14.32% | 22.76% | -9.18% | 14.12% | 1.37% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEC and SPY is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FDEC and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDEC vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEC
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FDEC
SPY
Financial Services
FDEC
SPY
Communication Services
FDEC
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
FDEC
SPY
Healthcare
FDEC
SPY
Industrials
FDEC
SPY
Consumer Defensive
FDEC
SPY
Energy
FDEC
SPY
Utilities
FDEC
SPY
Real Estate
FDEC
SPY
Basic Materials
FDEC
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FDEC
SPY
FDEC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.16 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 14.72 | +3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.38 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.82 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.59 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
FDEC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEC drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEC and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -55.19% | +39.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -8.88% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -18.76% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.67% | -24.50% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.70% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -9.05% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 1.91% | -0.79% |
Volatility
FDEC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (FDEC) is 1.27%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that FDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 2.84% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 8.90% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.62% | 11.83% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.21% | 17.05% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 17.94% | -6.93% |
FDEC vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEC FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FDEC and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FDEC (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEC dropped -15.67% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 10.58% for FDEC. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FDEC.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for FDEC.
FDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FDEC and 0.09% for SPY.
FDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEC and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer