PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AINT vs. MKTN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AINT vs. MKTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AINT

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.06%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MKTN

1D
0.04%
1M
3.11%
6M
5.10%
YTD
4.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.36K$21.43K$51.75K
$386.49K$382.07K$580.42K

AINT vs. MKTN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AINT and MKTN is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AINT vs. MKTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF (MKTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AINT vs. MKTN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AINT vs. MKTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINT drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than MKTN's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINT and MKTN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AINTMKTNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-4.13%

-13.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.97%

-0.15%

-16.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-1.10%

-6.11%

Volatility

AINT vs. MKTN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AINTMKTNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.44%

6.63%

+22.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

6.63%

+22.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.44%

6.63%

+22.81%

AINT vs. MKTN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINT has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MKTN's 1.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

AINT vs. MKTN - Dividend Comparison

AINT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MKTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AINT and MKTN have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINT is cheaper at 1.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINT is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for MKTN.

MKTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for AINT.

They also come from different issuers: FINQ and Federated Hermes. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for AINT and 1.94% for MKTN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AINT and MKTN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer