AINT vs. BTAL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AINT (FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF) and BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both Equity Market Neutral funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. AINT charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for BTAL.

Performance

AINT vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AINT

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -8.17%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTAL

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: -22.65%
• 6M: -21.47%
• 1Y: -36.40%
• 3Y*: -13.38%
• 5Y*: -5.39%
• 10Y*: -5.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINT vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AINT FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	7.48%
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-23.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AINT and BTAL is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026	-0.36

Return for Risk

AINT vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINT vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AINT	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.74	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.97	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.82	—

Drawdowns

AINT vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINT drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINT and BTAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINT	BTAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-52.70%	+36.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-47.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.90%	-51.79%	+35.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-22.07%	+15.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	20.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AINT	BTAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.05%	22.80%	+7.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.05%	19.10%	+10.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.05%	17.35%	+12.70%

AINT vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINT has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINT vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

AINT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AINT FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	3.22%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINT and BTAL in my portfolio?

AINT and BTAL have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AINT or BTAL?

On fees, AINT is cheaper at 1.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINT or BTAL?

AINT is cheaper with a 1.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for BTAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AINT or BTAL?

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for AINT.

What is the main difference between AINT and BTAL?

They also come from different issuers: FINQ and AGF. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for AINT and 1.40% for BTAL.