AINT vs. TQQQ
AINT (FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - AINT is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by FINQ, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). AINT is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AINT charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
AINT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AINT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 38.69%
- YTD
- 46.69%
- 1Y
- 85.21%
- 3Y*
- 57.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 43.22%
AINT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AINT FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF | 14.31% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 62.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AINT and TQQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AINT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ
AINT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF (AINT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AINT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AINT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINT drawdown since its inception was -15.90%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINT and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -81.66% | +65.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.55% | -11.48% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.52% | -18.48% | +11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility
AINT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AINT | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.39% | 54.89% | -25.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 67.67% | -38.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 66.35% | -36.96% |
AINT vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AINT has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AINT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
AINT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINT FINQ Dollar Neutral U.S. Large Cap AI-Managed Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.49% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AINT and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for AINT.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for AINT.
AINT is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: FINQ and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for AINT and 0.95% for TQQQ.
Find the right allocation for AINT and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer