AINP vs. AGRW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) and AGRW (Allspring LT Large Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AINP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Allspring, while AGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Allspring. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AINP returned 6.72% vs 26.33% for AGRW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AINP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AGRW.

Performance

AINP vs. AGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINP achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than AGRW's 10.64% return.

AINP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 6.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGRW

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 8.78%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 26.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AINP vs. AGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	1.33%	5.72%
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	10.64%	23.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AINP and AGRW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

AINP vs. AGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 61
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

AGRW

AGRW Risk / Return Rank: 41
AGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
AGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AINP vs. AGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AINP	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.67	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.27	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.63	+1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	5.47	+5.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AINP vs. AGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINP Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the AGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINP and AGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AINP	AGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	1.67	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	1.37	+0.04

Drawdowns

AINP vs. AGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINP drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum AGRW drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINP and AGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINP	AGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-16.46%	+13.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-16.46%	+13.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.68%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-3.28%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	4.91%	-4.30%

Volatility

AINP vs. AGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) is 1.15%, while Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that AINP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AINP	AGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	3.82%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.45%	12.32%	-9.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26%	15.81%	-12.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.63%	21.97%	-18.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.63%	21.97%	-18.34%

AINP vs. AGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AGRW's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINP vs. AGRW - Dividend Comparison

AINP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than AGRW's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGRW Allspring LT Large Growth ETF	0.11%	0.13%	0.00%
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.77%	5.03%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINP and AGRW in my portfolio?

AINP and AGRW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AINP or AGRW?

AGRW has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to AINP (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AINP dropped -2.61% vs AGRW's -16.46%.

Which ETF is better, AINP or AGRW?

On 1-year performance, AGRW leads with 26.33% vs 6.72% for AINP. On fees, AGRW is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AINP has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AINP or AGRW?

Over the 1-year period, AGRW has performed better with a 26.33% return vs 6.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINP or AGRW?

AGRW is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AINP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AINP or AGRW?

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 0.11% for AGRW.

What is the main difference between AINP and AGRW?

AINP is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while AGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AINP and 0.35% for AGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AINP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.