AINP vs. XAGG
AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AINP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.
Performance
AINP vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AINP achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 2.19% return.
AINP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.25%
XAGG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $155.19K | $151.21K | $205.79K | |
| $9.69M | $13.10M | $11.08M |
AINP vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 0.85% | 1.12% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.19% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AINP and XAGG is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AINP vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank
AINP
XAGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AINP vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AINP | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AINP vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AINP drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum XAGG drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINP and XAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AINP | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -2.88% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.49% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -0.53% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | — | — |
Volatility
AINP vs. XAGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AINP | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 3.42% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 3.42% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 3.42% | +0.16% |
AINP vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AINP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AINP vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison
AINP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than XAGG's 5.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF | 5.87% | 5.03% | 0.47% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 5.07% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AINP and XAGG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XAGG.
AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 5.07% for XAGG.
They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AINP and 0.50% for XAGG.
Find the right allocation for AINP and XAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer