AINP vs. AGGA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) and AGGA (Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AINP returned 3.52% vs 2.58% for AGGA. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AINP charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AGGA.

Performance

AINP vs. AGGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AINP achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than AGGA's 0.39% return.

AINP

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.25%

AGGA

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.79%
• 6M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF	$225.36K	$302.31K	$395.65K
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	$155.19K	$151.21K	$205.79K

AINP vs. AGGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	0.85%	5.60%
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF	0.39%	4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AINP and AGGA is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025	0.82

The correlation between AINP and AGGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AINP vs. AGGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 53
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

AGGA

AGGA Risk / Return Rank: 58
AGGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AGGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AGGA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AGGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AGGA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AINP vs. AGGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) and Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AINP	AGGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.38	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.01	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.03	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	7.50	-1.00

AINP vs. AGGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AINP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the AGGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AINP and AGGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AINP vs. AGGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AINP drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, which is greater than AGGA's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AINP and AGGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AINP	AGGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-1.47%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-1.47%	-1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.96%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-0.23%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.40%	+0.25%

Volatility

AINP vs. AGGA - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) at 0.65%. This indicates that AINP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AINP	AGGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.65%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	1.80%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28%	2.17%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.58%	2.24%	+1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.58%	2.24%	+1.34%

AINP vs. AGGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AINP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGA's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AINP vs. AGGA - Dividend Comparison

AINP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than AGGA's 4.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGGA Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF	4.25%	2.81%	0.00%
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.87%	5.03%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AINP and AGGA in my portfolio?

AINP and AGGA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AINP or AGGA?

AINP has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to AGGA (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AINP dropped -2.61% vs AGGA's -1.47%.

Which ETF is better, AINP or AGGA?

On 1-year performance, AINP leads with 3.52% vs 2.58% for AGGA. On fees, AINP is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AINP or AGGA?

Over the 1-year period, AINP has performed better with a 3.52% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AINP or AGGA?

AINP is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AGGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AINP or AGGA?

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 4.25% for AGGA.

What is the main difference between AINP and AGGA?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AINP and 0.55% for AGGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.