AIMS vs. SPSM
AIMS (Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF) and SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. AIMS is actively managed, while SPSM is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AIMS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
AIMS vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AIMS
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
AIMS vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 7.43% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIMS and SPSM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIMS vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
AIMS
SPSM
AIMS vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIMS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.45 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
AIMS vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIMS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -42.89% | +34.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.97% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -7.93% | +5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility
AIMS vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIMS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 17.47% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 21.43% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 22.99% | -3.05% |
AIMS vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIMS vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMS Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, AIMS and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIMS.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.
They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 0.05% for SPSM.
Find the right allocation for AIMS and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer