PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMS vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMS vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AIMS

1D
-1.35%
1M
2.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQS

1D
-1.70%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.27%
6M
27.40%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMS vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIMS and QQQS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMS vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMS

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMS vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIMS vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIMSQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.63

+0.69

Drawdowns

AIMS vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQS drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and QQQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMSQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-38.06%

+29.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.55%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-13.26%

+10.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

Volatility

AIMS vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMSQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

26.90%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

28.34%

-8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

28.34%

-8.40%

AIMS vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIMS vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AIMS
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.73%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIMS and QQQS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIMS.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.

They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 0.20% for QQQS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMS and QQQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer