PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIMS vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIMS vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AIMS

1D
-1.35%
1M
2.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIMS vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AIMS and ISCB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIMS vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIMS

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIMS vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF (AIMS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIMS vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIMSISCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.38

+0.94

Drawdowns

AIMS vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIMS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIMS and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIMSISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-61.25%

+52.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.67%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-9.80%

+7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

Volatility

AIMS vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIMSISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

16.51%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

21.39%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

22.68%

-2.74%

AIMS vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIMS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIMS vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

AIMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIMS
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AIMS and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIMS.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for AIMS.

They also come from different issuers: Acuitas Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AIMS and 0.04% for ISCB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIMS and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer