AIGP.L vs. GLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR).
AIGP.L and GLTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIGP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Precious Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. GLTR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2010. Both AIGP.L and GLTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 7.31% | 78.63% | 23.25% | 7.81% | -0.87% | -7.48% | 23.72% | 17.09% | -5.55% | 7.63% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 6.38% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGP.L achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGP.L has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 12.87%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.10% annualized return.
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 30.58%
- 1Y
- 61.25%
- 3Y*
- 33.91%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
GLTR
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 32.20%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIGP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AIGP.L vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
AIGP.L
GLTR
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIGP.L | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.87 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 2.11 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.38 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 8.28 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIGP.L | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.87 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 0.80 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.34 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGP.L and GLTR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIGP.L nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGP.L drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGP.L and GLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGP.L | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.05% | -55.70% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.14% | -29.70% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -29.70% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.53% | -29.70% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.46% | -23.32% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -28.89% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 8.54% | -2.44% |
Volatility
AIGP.L vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) is 12.74%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 13.48%. This indicates that AIGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AIGP.L | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.74% | 13.48% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 35.75% | -8.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.69% | 37.11% | -6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 23.16% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 20.28% | -0.44% |